It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 5:06 am
Board index » Talking About Stuff » Suzuki Talk



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message

Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 11:13 am
Posts: 28
Vehicle: 1992 suzuki sierra

Post Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:45 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Hi Guys

Looking to squeeze a bit more out of the 1.3 in my sierra. It seems to have quite a bit of back pressure even at idle.
Can feel the exhaust gasses at almost a meter back on the standard exhaust, not sure if this is normal but I think it is due to the standard 20yr old system.

Now the extractors I'm looking at on ebay are 1 1/2" primary, 1 3/4" secondarys and either a 2" or 2 1/4" outlet.
Plan to continue the exact same pipe diameter through to the rear with mandrel bends, hi-flow muffler and no cat.

What would be better the 2" or 2 1/4"? Just want some more in the mid-range 2500-4500 rpm, can defenitely feel it choke out in the higher rpm range.

Below are the two options im looking at.

Anyone have these extractors? Feel free to let me know what your setup is.

Also the standard head is a square exhaust port yet I believe these are round? Would this cause a significant turbulence/restriction?

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/SUZUKI-SIERR ... _750wt_940

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/SUZUKI-SIERR ... _687wt_940

Thanks Matt.

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:43 am
Posts: 685
Vehicle: 85 ' Drover

Post Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:59 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
zedboy wrote:
Hi Guys

Looking to squeeze a bit more out of the 1.3 in my sierra. It seems to have quite a bit of back pressure even at idle.
Can feel the exhaust gasses at almost a meter back on the standard exhaust, not sure if this is normal but I think it is due to the standard 20yr old system.


I'm confused by this. what do you mean you can feel the exhaust gasses at almost a meter back on the standard exhaust?

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 11:13 am
Posts: 28
Vehicle: 1992 suzuki sierra

Post Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:14 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
As in whilst its idling if you stand behind the exhaust at that distance you can still feel the exhaust gasses coming out with a bit of pressure to it - could it possibly be a collapsed muffler?.

droverdave wrote:
zedboy wrote:
Hi Guys

Looking to squeeze a bit more out of the 1.3 in my sierra. It seems to have quite a bit of back pressure even at idle.
Can feel the exhaust gasses at almost a meter back on the standard exhaust, not sure if this is normal but I think it is due to the standard 20yr old system.


I'm confused by this. what do you mean you can feel the exhaust gasses at almost a meter back on the standard exhaust?

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 12997
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:59 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
That's not really evidence of anything. A collapsed muffler won't have any bearing on the velocity of the gas coming out of the tailpipe.

Some people claim a significant difference in performance once they fit extractors, others claim very little. There's unfortunately not much hard evidence either way, but it certainly won't hurt. I'm a bit confused about what you want to achieve though- extractors will do less at lower revs, where there is less gas flow, than at high revs. As you're looking for increases from 2500-4500 rpm, thee light not be much to show for your $$. There will be more gain in the upper reaches of the rev range.

2.25" is too much pipe for a 1.3 Sierra. It will just add cost and noise and to little or nothing for power. 2" is more than enough.

Don't delete your cat. A generic 2" cat will be doing nothing to hurt power, and they aren't even very expensive. The only reason to delete one would be due to the idea that catalytic converters are good for the environment and therefore must be bad for performance, and that's silly. It's very illegal to remove one and the fines are HUGE, should you get caught.

Through all of this, just remember that the gains from extractors and exhaust are very small.

Steve.

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 11:13 am
Posts: 28
Vehicle: 1992 suzuki sierra

Post Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 4:05 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Ok thanks for that. 2" it will be if I get an exhaust fitted.

In terms of rpm was just a general range I gues its were the majority of the time the engine is at, try to avoid north of 5K as that where I can feels to choke out.

Gwagensteve wrote:
That's not really evidence of anything. A collapsed muffler won't have any bearing on the velocity of the gas coming out of the tailpipe.

Some people claim a significant difference in performance once they fit extractors, others claim very little. There's unfortunately not much hard evidence either way, but it certainly won't hurt. I'm a bit confused about what you want to achieve though- extractors will do less at lower revs, where there is less gas flow, than at high revs. As you're looking for increases from 2500-4500 rpm, thee light not be much to show for your $$. There will be more gain in the upper reaches of the rev range.

2.25" is too much pipe for a 1.3 Sierra. It will just add cost and noise and to little or nothing for power. 2" is more than enough.

Through all of this, just remember that the gains from extractors and exhaust are very small.

Steve.

 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

Jump to:  


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Untitled Document


Untitled Document


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group :: Style based on FI Subice by phpBBservice.nl :: All times are UTC + 9:30 hours