| Author |
Message |
camshaft
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:35 pm Posts: 22
Vehicle: nissan patrol
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:45 pm |
|
|
hey guys iv had this idea of putting a D4D in a stockmen and a coil all round conversion just wanting to know ur thoughts and if u think it posible. now i dont want it to be a comp truck i want it as a daily so good life and 33s wat do u think?
|
|
|
|
 |
Trypt
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:19 am Posts: 492
Vehicle: 1.3 Tin Top
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:51 pm |
|
|
d4d... my immediate thoughts are too heavy, too much power/torque. and toymota's dont belong in zooks.
whats wrong with a g16?
|
|
|
|
 |
camshaft
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:35 pm Posts: 22
Vehicle: nissan patrol
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:52 pm |
|
|
|
 |
Trypt
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:19 am Posts: 492
Vehicle: 1.3 Tin Top
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:58 pm |
|
|
|
 |
atari4x4

az supporter
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm Posts: 34843 Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 5:02 pm |
|
|
|
 |
camshaft
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:35 pm Posts: 22
Vehicle: nissan patrol
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 5:14 pm |
|
|
diesels r a far more superior motor for 4wd applications
|
|
|
|
 |
atari4x4

az supporter
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm Posts: 34843 Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 5:21 pm |
|
|
mabe if it waz powahring hilex or a patroll... not the best choise for a suzuki
_________________ You're just hating because you don't understand
|
|
|
|
 |
Trypt
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:19 am Posts: 492
Vehicle: 1.3 Tin Top
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 5:44 pm |
|
atari4x4 wrote: mabe if it waz powahring hilex or a patroll... not the best choise for a suzuki x2 you dont need 350+nm to move 1200kg.
|
|
|
|
 |
camshaft
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:35 pm Posts: 22
Vehicle: nissan patrol
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 5:55 pm |
|
|
true but better fuel economy and i just like diesels
|
|
|
|
 |
got_bar_work
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 8:30 pm Posts: 2214 Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: SQ625
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 6:02 pm |
|
|
Diesels are only good for towing They have shit power to weight Small power and rev range There every thing u dont want in a 4wd Gear a petrol low enough and it will lug up a hill at 1500rpm to but still be able to spin up 6g when u need a bit of wheel speed in a hurry In steep rocks u tend to have to drive the diesel in to high a gear to get the wheel speed needed to stop u fliping the car which kills the controll creeping up to the step Rant off
|
|
|
|
 |
Trypt
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:19 am Posts: 492
Vehicle: 1.3 Tin Top
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 6:11 pm |
|
if ur heart is set on a diesel go with one of vw options or smaller again. Diesel engines by there very nature are shite loads heavier. a d4d will not only be too heavy but will destroy your driveline, just like rhinoperformances 40" truck wheels Apart from the obvious benefits of being easier to fit and maintain a recoed 1.6 will last longer than a d4d.
|
|
|
|
 |
atari4x4

az supporter
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm Posts: 34843 Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 6:15 pm |
|
camshaft wrote: true but better fuel economy and i just like diesels i see you owning a hilux sometime soon.
_________________ You're just hating because you don't understand
|
|
|
|
 |
Trypt
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:19 am Posts: 492
Vehicle: 1.3 Tin Top
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 6:26 pm |
|
|
|
 |
jdk81
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 2372 Location: Ballarat, VIC
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 6:38 pm |
|
|
Probably best to keep it as an idea (bad idea), like the rest of us have done.
Stick with your patrol.
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 12997 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 6:59 pm |
|
camshaft wrote: diesels r a far more superior motor for 4wd applications Not in a suzuki they're not. Steve.
|
|
|
|
 |
Scrawny

I live here!
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 10528 Location: Brissie
Vehicle: Popemobile
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 7:05 pm |
|
Trypt wrote: a recoed 1.6 will last longer than a d4d. REALLY????? Based on what?
|
|
|
|
 |
Trypt
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:19 am Posts: 492
Vehicle: 1.3 Tin Top
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 9:10 pm |
|
Scrawn wrote: Trypt wrote: a recoed 1.6 will last longer than a d4d. REALLY????? Based on what? They are extremely under stressed over engineered motor. Simple mechanical injection with nowhere near the CR or Fuel pressure of modern common rail diesels. Good friend of mine has an old golf with a motor that has seen three cars. Over 800000 K's half of which on fish n chip oil.
|
|
|
|
 |
Shansh

az supporter
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:35 am Posts: 1816 Location: Goulburn NSW
Vehicle: Ducati Monster
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 9:12 pm |
|
|
do it, i reckon you have the skills and knowledge to make it happen, dont listen to these blokes who have tried most stuff you could think of and a fair few things you havent, i reckon you should chuck a big diesel in and go rip n tear
|
|
|
|
 |
atari4x4

az supporter
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm Posts: 34843 Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 9:14 pm |
|
Trypt wrote: Scrawn wrote: Trypt wrote: a recoed 1.6 will last longer than a d4d. REALLY????? Based on what? They are extremely under stressed over engineered motor. Simple mechanical injection with nowhere near the CR or Fuel pressure of modern common rail diesels. Good friend of mine has an old golf with a motor that has seen three cars. Over 800000 K's half of which on fish n chip oil. how about all the cracked G16B's blocks getting around or stuffed G16 heads. 
_________________ You're just hating because you don't understand
|
|
|
|
 |
Trypt
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:19 am Posts: 492
Vehicle: 1.3 Tin Top
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 9:16 pm |
|
WTF! I'm talking about the VW 1.6 tdi... 
|
|
|
|
 |
atari4x4

az supporter
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm Posts: 34843 Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 9:58 pm |
|
Trypt wrote: whats wrong with a g16?  sorry, thought you were still talking about the petrol G16 
_________________ You're just hating because you don't understand
|
|
|
|
 |
camshaft
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:35 pm Posts: 22
Vehicle: nissan patrol
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 11:14 pm |
|
|
it was just and idea iv alwaysed loved the smallness of suzis but wanted the fuel econ and well lets face it diesels r better with water... but yah i thought the d4d would b to big but i never though of the vw motor
|
|
|
|
 |
DarkHorse

az supporter
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 11:30 pm Posts: 5413
Vehicle: 08 SV650
|
 Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 12:26 am |
|
My petrol 1.6 hauling my heavier-than-normal Vit on 31s had comparable fuel consumption to my mates TD LC80. Small motors in small cars (even with not-so-small tyres) don't use a whole lot of juice. As for water - chuck a snorkel on it and you'll drown before the motor does. 
|
|
|
|
 |
Scrawny

I live here!
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 10528 Location: Brissie
Vehicle: Popemobile
|
 Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:18 am |
|
Trypt wrote: Scrawn wrote: Trypt wrote: a recoed 1.6 will last longer than a d4d. REALLY????? Based on what? They are extremely under stressed over engineered motor. Simple mechanical injection with nowhere near the CR or Fuel pressure of modern common rail diesels. Good friend of mine has an old golf with a motor that has seen three cars. Over 800000 K's half of which on fish n chip oil. So based purely on opinion, that's cool. I was looking after a 08 Hiace van with the 3.0 D4D motor that was approaching 450,000kms. It still had the original injectors and pump in it, driven hard day and night, extended service intervals (15-20,000) and it used no oil and blew little to no smoke. I think these motors are good too (my opinion  ) and yes, I thought you were talking about a G16 too
|
|
|
|
 |
Damo

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 4661 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:50 am |
|
Scrawn wrote: Trypt wrote: Scrawn wrote: Trypt wrote: a recoed 1.6 will last longer than a d4d. REALLY????? Based on what? They are extremely under stressed over engineered motor. Simple mechanical injection with nowhere near the CR or Fuel pressure of modern common rail diesels. Good friend of mine has an old golf with a motor that has seen three cars. Over 800000 K's half of which on fish n chip oil. So based purely on opinion, that's cool. I was looking after a 08 Hiace van with the 3.0 D4D motor that was approaching 450,000kms. It still had the original injectors and pump in it, driven hard day and night, extended service intervals (15-20,000) and it used no oil and blew little to no smoke. I think these motors are good too (my opinion  ) and yes, I thought you were talking about a G16 tooAvailability of the engine, and its parts would be much higher compared to vw stuff too.
_________________ SJ50.4.LYF
|
|
|
|
 |
got_bar_work
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 8:30 pm Posts: 2214 Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: SQ625
|
 Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 7:12 am |
|
|
Y does every one say diesels are better in water Ive seen plenty of zooks with no snorkel drive around with water over the hood If u do get water in it u usually just need to pull the the plugs and crank it a few times to spit out any water and leave it for a while to dry Get water in a diesel and ur looking at 5- 15000 for a new motor
|
|
|
|
 |
Damo

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 4661 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 7:21 am |
|
got_bar_work wrote: Y does every one say diesels are better in water Because diesels don't have an electrical ignition system.
_________________ SJ50.4.LYF
|
|
|
|
 |
pezz

az supporter
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 2108 Location: western vic
Vehicle: sj51
|
 Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 8:07 am |
|
camshaft wrote: it was just and idea iv alwaysed loved the smallness of suzis but wanted the fuel econ and well lets face it diesels r better with water... but yah i thought the d4d would b to big but i never though of the vw motor so you want it purely for economy and drivability under water? late model petrol engines are very frugal and with coils integrated to the plug stem they are great at avoiding water but the key to economy is how you drive it i have a 2006 swift and it returns 6ltr/100kms i also have a d4d hiace, it returns 12ltrs/100kms yes the hiace is fully laden to 3300kgs all day every day, but even when it were empty the best it got was 11ltrs/100kms so i guess my point is, if you are going to stuff your sierra full of gold bullion you best get cracking on that d4d conversion, but if not, rethink engine options and learn how to drive you rig to get the economy you desire
|
|
|
|
 |
got_bar_work
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 8:30 pm Posts: 2214 Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: SQ625
|
 Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 8:13 am |
|
|
A zook would float away before the coil gets wet New diesels have just as much electrical shit to go wrong anyway
|
|
|
|
 |
camshaft
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:35 pm Posts: 22
Vehicle: nissan patrol
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 3:49 am |
|
|
|
 |
|