It is currently Thu Apr 23, 2026 8:32 am
Board index » Talking About Stuff » Suzuki Talk



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 7:24 am
Posts: 293
Location: sunshine coast

Post Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:40 am 
Reply with quote Top  
been looking around and the 1.3 seems fairly cheap to mod.

im very much considering rebuilding one down the track, has anyone done this before and had any decent results? im not talk crazy power levels, but with higher compression and a nice cam and carby theres no reason why a few ponies can't be had?

any ideas?

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:30 pm
Posts: 9711
Location: NSW
Vehicle: SJ51 LWB, SJ70 SWB

Post Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:43 am 
Reply with quote Top  
PM 31zook.

He has a worked G13 in his lwb.

_________________
BlueSuzy wrote:
I'm over the G16b's.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 455
Location: Newcastle NSW
Vehicle: I drive your mum

Post Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 7:16 am 
Reply with quote Top  
If you can do work yourself it is quite cheap. But in the end you have to weigh up the gains and cost against the cost and gains of an engine conversion. If you going to work your motor, you really have to include fuel injection. Not only will it increase power, but more importantly it will allow you to get rid of the pesky carby and its issues with driving angles.

Layto....

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 177
Location: Newcastle

Post Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 7:43 am 
Reply with quote Top  
31 has a wicked 1300 in his zuk that should last a long time as its well built but it cost $$
My pos has a 1600 exhuast and a worked weber and manifold that cost me more than the motor and isnt as good but was cheaper and all diy. ..if I did it again my $ would go on a rebuilt 1300 with a few mods (talk to 31zook) as you know youve got a good solid motor.
Or an injected 1600 could be around the same $$ but its a used motor but its also injected 8)
Nik

_________________
No zooks just VWs

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 2372
Location: Ballarat, VIC

Post Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:06 am 
Reply with quote Top  
31zook will be installing tbi off a swift shortly too, as hes had issues with the carby.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 7:24 am
Posts: 293
Location: sunshine coast

Post Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:08 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
LAY80N wrote:
If you can do work yourself it is quite cheap. But in the end you have to weigh up the gains and cost against the cost and gains of an engine conversion. If you going to work your motor, you really have to include fuel injection. Not only will it increase power, but more importantly it will allow you to get rid of the pesky carby and its issues with driving angles.

Layto....


Yea thats not drama, Im just about to finish my mechanical apprenticeship and I've built a few engines for mates. So labour is fine and parts i can get at trade.

Your right, fuel injection would be very handy, the other thing i looked at was the conversion kit on lowrangeoffroad.com to adapt a motorbike carby which would also rectify the problem wouldnt it?

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 4268
Location: Eyre Peninsula

Post Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:20 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
The angles motorbikes get to, Id say yes, that would fix the problem.

I have looked at some of the quad carb setups over in the States, they really look the goods, and would sound dam fine.

_________________
Bad decisions make good stories.

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 92
Location: moe

Post Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 10:00 am 
Reply with quote Top  
I just fully rebuilt my 1.3, iv had it ballanced, bored out 40 thou, heads ported, lukey extractors and full 2 inch sports exhaustand exedy heavy duty clutch.
it is heaps smoother then a standard 1.3 and has a bit more torque for hills but dont expect it to set the world on fire its still a little motor.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 16343
Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.

Post Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 10:22 am 
Reply with quote Top  
^^ yep.

my 1.6EFI has jimny top end, extractors (lukey) and 2" pipe (with 2" cat) and it HAMMERS... but thats by sierra standards =) its certainly fast to 70km/hr but after that aerodynamics take over and ruin everything!

honestly it'd be far more power gain and cheaper to chuck a 1.6 bottom end on your current setup, then EFI it later (or SPI). its bolt on, and its reliable and far easier to fix if anything goes wrong.

_________________
Image

 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

Jump to:  


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 102 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Untitled Document


Untitled Document


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group :: Style based on FI Subice by phpBBservice.nl :: All times are UTC + 9:30 hours