| Author |
Message |
KEENSY85
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 12:46 am Posts: 1742 Location: north brisbane
Vehicle: 1985 lwb sierra UTE
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:35 pm |
|
|
Iv heard the largest engine you can put in a sierra is a 2.4l in qld ...has any one got any info ? Is there anything in the tech Centre
|
|
|
|
 |
speedyblue
Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 1:14 pm Posts: 49
Vehicle: Jimny/110 Landy
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:35 pm |
|
|
According to the NCOP: max engine cc = weight (kg) x 5 Turbo engines are less. 3x I think.
|
|
|
|
 |
Joshyboy26
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 11:48 pm Posts: 814 Location: kinglake, VIC
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:47 pm |
|
|
3.6 litre? surely not that sounds like a lot
|
|
|
|
 |
Fatzook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14977 Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:27 pm |
|
speedyblue wrote: According to the NCOP: max engine cc = weight (kg) x 5 Turbo engines are less. 3x I think. read it again. The section you are refering to states: "For certification purposes under Codes LA1, LA2, LA3 and LA4, the recommended maximum capacity (swept volume) of engines for passenger cars and passenger car derivatives is outlined in Table LA1 below. An engine may not be a suitable replacement even if its capacity falls within the limits specified in Table LA1. Owners are therefore advised to check details of a proposed engine conversion with an engineering signatory prior to commencing any work." There is no blanket rule anymore. The signatory must determine if the vehicle meets the requirements checklist before signing off that modification. Given this, I think you'll find it hard to get an engineer to sign off on a 4.7L (950kgx5) engine in a sierra. 
_________________ 2013 GV 1998 SV420 ute
|
|
|
|
 |
KEENSY85
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 12:46 am Posts: 1742 Location: north brisbane
Vehicle: 1985 lwb sierra UTE
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 4:49 am |
|
Fatzook wrote: speedyblue wrote: According to the NCOP: max engine cc = weight (kg) x 5 Turbo engines are less. 3x I think. read it again. The section you are refering to states: "For certification purposes under Codes LA1, LA2, LA3 and LA4, the recommended maximum capacity (swept volume) of engines for passenger cars and passenger car derivatives is outlined in Table LA1 below. An engine may not be a suitable replacement even if its capacity falls within the limits specified in Table LA1. Owners are therefore advised to check details of a proposed engine conversion with an engineering signatory prior to commencing any work." There is no blanket rule anymore. The signatory must determine if the vehicle meets the requirements checklist before signing off that modification. Given this, I think you'll find it hard to get an engineer to sign off on a 4.7L (950kgx5) engine in a sierra.  Thanks Fats
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 8:02 am |
|
|
In WA the limit used to be a 1.8L engine without a brake upgrade - not sure if that's changed though... but you can do a 1.6 without a brake upgrade for sure. Brake upgrade = engineering.
|
|
|
|
 |
droverdave
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:43 am Posts: 685
Vehicle: 85 ' Drover
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:05 am |
|
i see you are in brisbane. ring this guy. http://www.modplate.com.au/Randal is his name, nice guy, happy to chat. The rules change for each state, even with NCOP.
|
|
|
|
 |
KEENSY85
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 12:46 am Posts: 1742 Location: north brisbane
Vehicle: 1985 lwb sierra UTE
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:32 am |
|
droverdave wrote: i see you are in brisbane. ring this guy. http://www.modplate.com.au/Randal is his name, nice guy, happy to chat. The rules change for each state, even with NCOP. Thanks buddy 
|
|
|
|
 |
tanshi

az supporter
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 7719 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:35 am |
|
|
ive had a 2.7 preaprroved with brake mods
|
|
|
|
 |
KEENSY85
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 12:46 am Posts: 1742 Location: north brisbane
Vehicle: 1985 lwb sierra UTE
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 8:42 pm |
|
|
Wich engine ? Im allways keen to hear whay ur up to
|
|
|
|
 |
tanshi

az supporter
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 7719 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 8:38 am |
|
|
2.7 GV motor, ive been told by the engineer that he would pass it provisionally.
im not actually doing this swap at this stage though
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 3:43 pm |
|
|
you'd require chassis stengthening for a 2.7L wouldnt you??? lol
|
|
|
|
 |
tanshi

az supporter
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 7719 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 3:48 pm |
|
|
|
 |
Fatzook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14977 Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 4:42 pm |
|
tanshi wrote: aparently not I'm with alien. Some extra cross members would be required IMO. Even though the H27 only puts out 130kw and 250Nm ( which IMO makes it a ridiculous venture ) its still almost 3 times the power and 2.5 times the torque of the engine the chassis was designed for.
_________________ 2013 GV 1998 SV420 ute
|
|
|
|
 |
tanshi

az supporter
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 7719 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 4:45 pm |
|
|
cross members? as in how?
i wondered whether i should do similar to the LJ ute but dont really know what should be added that would help.
specially as im planning in racing it too
|
|
|
|
 |
Fatzook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14977 Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 4:49 pm |
|
|
What do you mean 'How'? Beef up the front and rear ones, Box in the centre body mount member, add a decent gearbox crossmember (something like patrols etc run but in a more suzuki friendly package )
LJ chassis would be even worse.
_________________ 2013 GV 1998 SV420 ute
|
|
|
|
 |
tanshi

az supporter
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 7719 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 4:53 pm |
|
|
ahh ok so just cross members would be enough.
i was half asleep thinking rails should be braced lengthwise
i have added some good strength to the body crossmambers and have a good solid gearbox crossmember and replaced the front tube with something beefier
|
|
|
|
 |
Fatzook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14977 Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:22 pm |
|
|
I don't think laminating the rails will do all that much.
_________________ 2013 GV 1998 SV420 ute
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:03 pm |
|
|
Gussetting the existing crossmembers would prolly help too... i reckon you'd have to laminate / fisch plate all around the new engine mounts too.
|
|
|
|
 |
|