It is currently Tue Apr 21, 2026 8:39 am
Board index » Talking About Stuff » Suzuki Talk



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 2801
Location: Perth

Post Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:59 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
These may give you some ideas, pity there is no recent updates :(

http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/suzuki/6 ... stuff.html

Image

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm
Posts: 34843
Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's

Post Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:09 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
not much sierra left in that one :lol:

_________________
You're just hating because you don't understand

 Profile WWW  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 726
Location: Adelaide
Vehicle: 1985 Suzuki MightyBoy

Post Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:27 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
atari4x4 wrote:
Trypt wrote:
The dont they idle at 2g?
I think you will find that any rotary making good power AND torque from down low will be lumpier than a stroker and there for pointless in a 4wd.

Bye


yeah maybe when peripheral ported :roll:

stock 13b it will idle around 1000rpm


with a skilled tuner it doesnt matter how aggressive the porting is, a 12a or 13b can idle smoothly at 800-900rpm one of my tradeschool lecturers lives and breathes rotors and has for 30+ years and has done it to many rotors including IDE carbed rotors. but apparently its quite the trick to get it right but is doable

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:55 pm
Posts: 9347
Location: Newcastle
Vehicle: G13BB Jimny

Post Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 7:52 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Not a cool rotary unless its going "braap braap braap braap" and skipping sideways at idle.

_________________
mlm

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 726
Location: Adelaide
Vehicle: 1985 Suzuki MightyBoy

Post Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 8:18 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
SierraDan wrote:
Not a cool rotary unless its going "braap braap braap braap" and skipping sideways at idle.

he still gets the typical noise under throttle, and loves the stealth aspect of it

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:55 pm
Posts: 9347
Location: Newcastle
Vehicle: G13BB Jimny

Post Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 8:21 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Jester wrote:
SierraDan wrote:
Not a cool rotary unless its going "braap braap braap braap" and skipping sideways at idle.

he still gets the typical noise under throttle, and loves the stealth aspect of it

Thats nice.

_________________
mlm

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 242
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:03 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
ea81 will fit

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm
Posts: 34843
Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's

Post Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:35 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
so does a VN commodore motor.... still doesn't make it a good choice. :wink:

_________________
You're just hating because you don't understand

 Profile WWW  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 10:57 pm
Posts: 566
Location: Mid North Coast NSW

Post Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 6:36 am 
Reply with quote Top  
An ET pulsar motor (1.5L turbo) fits too but the starter hangs too low and the diff hits the starter motor on compression...

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 242
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 11:01 am 
Reply with quote Top  
The reason I say ea81 is thats its pushrod has heaps of usable torque and weighs a tad less than a G16b unlike the SOHC and DOHC units which weigh almost double a G13A. For some reason the SOHC. DOHC units are super heavy compared to the OHV which is also used for ultralights and renown for its durabilty, no belts to change or chains to weigh it down and simple pushrods to keep it all at intended rpm and service ability.

Specifications
Displacement: 1,781 cc
Bore: 92 mm
Stroke: 67 mm
Compression Ratio: 8.7:1
Valvetrain: OHV Pushrod
Horsepower: 73 bhp (54 kW; 74 PS) at 4,800 rpm
Torque: 94 lb·ft (127 N·m) at 2,400 rpm
Found on
1980-1989 Subaru Leone
1981-1987 Subaru BRAT


g13a
53 kW (71 hp) @ 6,000; 102Nm (75 ft-lb) @ 4,000)

g16b
95 hp (71 kW) @ 5,600 rpm; 132nm (98 ft-lb) @ 4,000 rpm.
versus
(54 kW; 74 PS) @ 4,800 rpm; 127nm (94 lb·ft) @ 2,400 rpm!!!!!!

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:30 pm
Posts: 7719
Location: Brisbane

Post Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 11:09 am 
Reply with quote Top  
looks like a shit load of effort for little to no gain.

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 242
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 1:50 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
It would be different but still:
Realiability is superior,
ea81t turbo bits bolts on,
ea series is bullet proof
sits lower in engine bay
better torque (boost or not)
no timing belts or chains
stock internals stronger
sounds better :mrgreen:

My pick would be a 1mm+ bore factory g13b GTI bottom end
ported g16a top end with bigger exhaust valves, supercharger,
SU, good pipes & adapted vitara box with matching Vit bits.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm
Posts: 34843
Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's

Post Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 3:20 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
datso wrote:
It would be different but still:
Realiability is superior,
ea81t turbo bits bolts on,
ea series is bullet proof
sits lower in engine bay
better torque (boost or not)
no timing belts or chains
stock internals stronger
sounds better :mrgreen:

My pick would be a 1mm+ bore factory g13b GTI bottom end
ported g16a top end with bigger exhaust valves, supercharger,
SU, good pipes & adapted vitara box with matching Vit bits.


then you'd have to lower your drive train to suit... personally i think it's a stupid idea which ever way you try to polish that turd, just because it's a free engine doesn't make it a good idea.

_________________
You're just hating because you don't understand

 Profile WWW  

Offline

Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 4:28 pm
Posts: 89
Vehicle: 94 LWB VITARA

Post Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 8:20 am 
Reply with quote Top  
rotor sound done right=schweeeet!!! subaaaroo noise done in anyway is like what atari said but more like a wet fart just before someone proper shits emself!

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 12:46 am
Posts: 1742
Location: north brisbane
Vehicle: 1985 lwb sierra UTE

Post Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 3:05 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Attari4x4 it only sits lower due to the enginebeing a boxter engine there not that tall until the later 1s,they used to keep the spare tyre on top of it under the bonnet ((im not taking the piss :))

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:53 pm
Posts: 5933
Location: Northcliffe, W.A.
Vehicle: LJs, Sierra, Jimny, Swift.

Post Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 8:42 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
atari4x4 wrote:
datso wrote:
It would be different but still:
Realiability is superior,
ea81t turbo bits bolts on,
ea series is bullet proof
sits lower in engine bay
better torque (boost or not)
no timing belts or chains
stock internals stronger
sounds better :mrgreen:

My pick would be a 1mm+ bore factory g13b GTI bottom end
ported g16a top end with bigger exhaust valves, supercharger,
SU, good pipes & adapted vitara box with matching Vit bits.


then you'd have to lower your drive train to suit...


You wouldn't get the crankshaft any lower, there's still a diff in the way. Actually, just looking at that pic... The camshaft appears to be below the cank so it'l probably have to go higher to get diff clearance.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 14977
Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV

Post Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 10:19 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
sideways wrote:
The camshaft appears to be below the cank so it'l probably have to go higher to get diff clearance.



Finally! A use for SPOA :lol:

_________________
2013 GV
1998 SV420 ute

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 12:46 am
Posts: 1742
Location: north brisbane
Vehicle: 1985 lwb sierra UTE

Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:58 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
:rofl:

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 668
Location: sunshine coast

Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:10 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
do it subies all the way

 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Jump to:  


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 166 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Untitled Document


Untitled Document


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group :: Style based on FI Subice by phpBBservice.nl :: All times are UTC + 9:30 hours