It is currently Tue Apr 21, 2026 10:39 pm
Board index » Talking About Stuff » Suzuki Talk



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 
Author Message

Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 23
Location: Arthurton South Aust

Post Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 2:53 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Can someone tell me what is the difference in MM is between the Wide track and the Standard Track?

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:30 pm
Posts: 2123
Location: Deep Inside Jamies Mouth
Vehicle: Clown Car..

Post Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 3:00 am 
Reply with quote Top  
try a search for WT NT differences.. Bog Frogs thread has a HEAP of useful info..

_________________
Roads... Where we're going we dont need Roads....

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 11:30 pm
Posts: 4361
Location: gong
Vehicle: 2015 Jimny, LJ50, Maruti

Post Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 3:24 am 
Reply with quote Top  
wide track has wider diffs narow track has narow diffs capish? :no: :finger:

_________________
www.illawarrasuzuki4wdclub.webs.com

 Profile YIM  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:30 pm
Posts: 2123
Location: Deep Inside Jamies Mouth
Vehicle: Clown Car..

Post Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 3:28 am 
Reply with quote Top  
isnt it wide track has wide track diffs.. the rest are just a 'standard track'!?

_________________
Roads... Where we're going we dont need Roads....

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 23
Location: Arthurton South Aust

Post Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:55 am 
Reply with quote Top  
i get that 1 is wider than the other, but by how much in millimeters. And what do they come out of?

 Profile  

Offline
lesspostingmorewheeling
lesspostingmorewheeling
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 11:30 pm
Posts: 2236
Location: Under Down Under

Post Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:08 am 
Reply with quote Top  
wide tracks were made from half way through 1988 to halfway through 1996 the most obvious way to tell them apart is the wide tracks have metal flares whereas narrow tracks have rubber flares and WTs have plastic corners on the bumpers that NTs don't have

_________________
[quote="Fluffy"] yeah right mate like Im gunna mov

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 23
Location: Arthurton South Aust

Post Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 6:15 am 
Reply with quote Top  
ahhh ok!
thanks heaps for the info!

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 895
Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD
Vehicle: LWB Maruthi on WT Diffs!

Post Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 10:42 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Track widths wms - wms
NT
Front 49 WMS
Rear 49 WMS
WT
Front 52 WMS
Rear 52 WMS

_________________
My Maruti build, Click WWW

 Profile WWW  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:30 pm
Posts: 9711
Location: NSW
Vehicle: SJ51 LWB, SJ70 SWB

Post Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 1:07 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Widetracks rule. :lol:

_________________
BlueSuzy wrote:
I'm over the G16b's.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 14499
Location: Here there everywhere
Vehicle: A manly awesome man jimny

Post Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 1:14 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
hay BlueSuzy has it got the plastic W/T wheel arch flares?

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:30 pm
Posts: 9711
Location: NSW
Vehicle: SJ51 LWB, SJ70 SWB

Post Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 1:17 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Topic turn* Sori :oops:

Havent seen it yet! They look rusty in pics so im guessing its metal :lol:

_________________
BlueSuzy wrote:
I'm over the G16b's.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 14499
Location: Here there everywhere
Vehicle: A manly awesome man jimny

Post Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 1:39 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
opps i dunno how that happened. the question was meant to be in this thread. :oops:
http://www.auszookers.com/index.php?nam ... pic&t=6005

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:30 pm
Posts: 9711
Location: NSW
Vehicle: SJ51 LWB, SJ70 SWB

Post Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 2:18 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
silly shep :lol:

_________________
BlueSuzy wrote:
I'm over the G16b's.

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 23
Location: Arthurton South Aust

Post Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:46 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
xedent,
thanks for the specs. Big help!!
what does WMS acctually stand for?

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:30 pm
Posts: 7719
Location: Brisbane

Post Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:52 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
WMS = wheel mounting surface

There is about 90mm difference between the narrow track and the wide track.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 455
Location: Newcastle NSW
Vehicle: I drive your mum

Post Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:53 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
4WD4LIFE wrote:
xedent,
thanks for the specs. Big help!!
what does WMS acctually stand for?


Wheel Mounting Surface. Basically the flat surface on the hub that the wheel sits against.

Layto....

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 10:30 pm
Posts: 490
Location: Rosevears Tas

Post Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:04 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
xedent wrote:
Track widths wms - wms
NT
Front 49 WMS
Rear 49 WMS
WT
Front 52 WMS
Rear 52 WMS


Guessing that is in inches ??

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 5
Location: Sunny Coast

Post Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 11:42 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Im looking at getting an 88 ute, would this be a WT?? i saw someone saying that that half way thru 88 they were WT, Im just wondering if its the same with the utes.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 2447
Vehicle: LJ50V, SJ70

Post Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2009 10:43 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Some comparisons:
The following table is for Front track (track = centreline of tyre to tyre), rear track and wheelbase (front axle to rear axle):

LJ20 F 1090mm R 1100mm W/B 1930mm
LJ50 F 1090mm R 1100mm W/B 1930mm
LJ80 F 1190mm R 1200mm W/B 1930mm
LJ81 F 1190mm R 1200mm W/B 2200mm (Ute)
SJ40 F 1210mm R 1220mm W/B 2030mm *
SJ40 F 1210mm R 1220mm W/B 2375mm (LWB +Ute)
SJ50 F 1210mm R 1220mm W/B 2030mm **
SJ50 F 1210mm R 1220mm W/B 2375mm (LWB + Ute)
SJ70 F 1300mm R 1310mm W/B 2030mm
SE416 F 1395mm R 1400mm W/B 2200mm (Vitara)

* The SJ40 (1.0lt Sierra) was available with either 6.00-16 bar treads or FR78-15 on sunraysia type rims. Subtract 20mm from track for 6.00-16, and the track is the same as for LJ80/81.

** The SJ50 was available as the Narrow track or the first type Wide Track. The figures here represent the N/T specs. SJ70 specs are the same as for SJ50 W/T.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 2447
Vehicle: LJ50V, SJ70

Post Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2009 10:46 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
danno wrote:
Im looking at getting an 88 ute, would this be a WT??

The Utility was only Narrow Track, but the LWB was produced in Wide Track. The Ute was Discontinued in 87, and the LWB in 88, but demand from farmers for an Ag vehicle saw the Maruti introduced as a N/T LWB in 88 and conversions were done to these to fit an alloy tray, effectively making them a "Ute".

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:30 pm
Posts: 9711
Location: NSW
Vehicle: SJ51 LWB, SJ70 SWB

Post Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:48 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
My 88 WT LWB Was built in Janurary. Genuine Suzuki. Not Maruti. They also call them an SJ51 on the build plate. Not SJ50.

_________________
BlueSuzy wrote:
I'm over the G16b's.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 2447
Vehicle: LJ50V, SJ70

Post Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 10:05 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Well, I did say that 88 was the last year for the Suzuki LWB W/T, didn't I??
Danno was talking about an "88 Ute", and Suzuki had discontinued the Ute in 87 (which was an N/t), and brought in the N/T Maruti to do alloy tray conversions to. I don't believe any of the Suzuki-made W/T LWBs were converted into tray-top Utes.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 366
Location: Brisbane - Nthside
Vehicle: 1993 Suzuki Vitara 4dr Wgn

Post Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2025 5:25 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
303zuke wrote:
danno wrote:
Im looking at getting an 88 ute, would this be a WT??

The Utility was only Narrow Track, but the LWB was produced in Wide Track. The Ute was Discontinued in 87, and the LWB in 88, but demand from farmers for an Ag vehicle saw the Maruti introduced as a N/T LWB in 88 and conversions were done to these to fit an alloy tray, effectively making them a "Ute".


The Maruti ute from India - what year did it stop coming into Australia?

Were ALL Maruti Utes "NT's" or were the later ones WT?

_________________
'93 4Dr Vit, Red Gears,Bighorn 30" MTs, Sliders:B/

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:30 pm
Posts: 987
Location: Hobart

Post Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2025 7:22 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Later one were WT.

 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 

Jump to:  


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 786 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Untitled Document


Untitled Document


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group :: Style based on FI Subice by phpBBservice.nl :: All times are UTC + 9:30 hours