| Author |
Message |
billrogers
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 11:03 pm Posts: 81 Location: Dubbo 2830 NSW
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:43 pm |
|
|
I am due to replace the exhaust system on my 2000 G13 Auto Jimny, my thoughts are to use the stock manifold and engine pipe, then fit a new
2" cat and system. (pensioner upgrade)
OK.. will this be any benefit or should I also go for headers?
Regards Bill
Stiock Standard
2000 G13BB
Auto
Nudge, D Lights
Cooper 205/70-15 s
|
|
|
|
 |
laurie

az supporter
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 1540 Location: Blackbutt
Vehicle: LJ80
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:53 pm |
|
i would go for headers as they give a small benefit to power, torque and
economy all day every day with no maintenance. 
|
|
|
|
 |
lordviper556
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 716 Location: sunny coast qld
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 6:23 am |
|
|
i got a set of extractors and a full 2" system on mine (its an m13a) and it was deff worth it. i would deff get extractors if you have the money.
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:06 am |
|
|
do the whole system from the engine to the tip in one hit, anything else is pointless.
also, 1.75" is better suited to jimny 1300 than a 2" - but 2" would be the max you'd want to fit.
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
dm90
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 4349 Location: Perth
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:10 am |
|
alien wrote: do the whole system from the engine to the tip in one hit, anything else is pointless.
also, 1.75" is better suited to jimny 1300 than a 2" - but 2" would be the max you'd want to fit.
what makes yu say that???
|
|
|
|
 |
Benz
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 1006 Location: Cervantes WA
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:15 am |
|
dm90 wrote: alien wrote: do the whole system from the engine to the tip in one hit, anything else is pointless.
also, 1.75" is better suited to jimny 1300 than a 2" - but 2" would be the max you'd want to fit. what makes yu say that???
yeah i would also like to know
i know someone who got 2.5" on a jimny and he said it was far too big
what is the standard size?
|
|
|
|
 |
dm90
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 4349 Location: Perth
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:26 am |
|
|
most people get 2 inch
and thats what i was gonna get but if alien and some exhaust experts can convince me other wise then so be it
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:53 am |
|
|
exhaust guys i spoke to said 1.5" on standard headers or 1.75" if aftermarket/performance headers. 2" for 1.6l.
that and you dont want it to be too loud which attracts attention and stops you hearing what your spotter is saying offroad.
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
Birdman1985

az supporter
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 651 Location: Rutherford,NSW
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 9:27 am |
|
|
It may also have to do with the exhaust flow. You don't want there to be too much free flowing exhaust gas. It is meant to have a little pressure behind it.
_________________ Mitch.
|
|
|
|
 |
JrZook
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 5517 Location: Holland Park
Vehicle: Awesome!!
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:33 pm |
|
Birdman1985 wrote: It may also have to do with the exhaust flow. You don't want there to be too much free flowing exhaust gas. It is meant to have a little pressure behind it.
Something like that. You want to maintain the maximum gas flow velocity over the working rev range without restriction. Going from 1.75 to 2" the difference will be quite insignificant. Going from stock to a 1.75 or 2" system with high flow cat, muffler and headers will provide you with a noticeable difference in power and power delivery.
Dan
_________________ Lil Foot!
http://tiny.cc/gtsw1
|
|
|
|
 |
|